Mark the Evangelist: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 04:2604:26, 28 May 2024‎ Talevos talk contribs‎ m 32,048 bytes −15‎ In line with the article on Philip the Apostle, I'm changing 'Syriac' to 'Aramaic' as this accurately describes the language they spoke at the time, and will also be less confusing for readers who might suspect that these are two completely different languages. undo Tag: Visual edit
curprev 04:0604:06, 28 May 2024‎ Talevos talk contribs‎ m 32,063 bytes +309‎ Addition of Greek/Syriac (Aramaic) names for Mark the Evangelist. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 16:2316:23, 20 May 2024‎ Newtestamentthoughts talk contribs‎ 31,754 bytes −205‎ That paragraph was not supported by the source. In the source, the author is talking specifically about the authorship of the gospel of John, not the of the four gospels as a whole. To make that claim about the four gospels as a whole would require a different source. undo

curprev 22:5522:55, 13 May 2024‎ Newimpartial talk contribs‎ 31,959 bytes +1,217‎ Restored revision 1222628765 by Tgeorgescu (talk): Wikipedia article content is based on reliable sources of the highest available quality, and not the strongly held beliefs of editors undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 22:2922:29, 13 May 2024‎ Adrianopolitan378 talk contribs‎ 30,742 bytes −1,074‎ The anonymity theory of all gospels while having support from most non-christian biblical scholars, should not be passed off as an undisputed fact. Because not only is it not undisputed but it makes the article forfeit its neutrality. "Most biblical scholars agree" is less biased than "The gospels are all anyonymous". Not worthy of an encyclopedia undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 22:1822:18, 13 May 2024‎ Adrianopolitan378 talk contribs‎ 31,816 bytes −143‎ Doesn't belong at the start of the article. Shoulfmd go into a special section. It's not all modern scholars either, so this is biased. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:5100:51, 7 May 2024‎ Tgeorgescu talk contribs‎ m 31,959 bytes −16‎ Reverted 1 edit by 203.45.17.106 (talk) to last revision by Newimpartial undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 00:5000:50, 7 May 2024‎ 203.45.17.106 talk‎ 31,975 bytes +16‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 02:4102:41, 5 May 2024‎ Newimpartial talk contribs‎ 31,959 bytes +142‎ References are in the article body. Undid revision 1222287985 by 2601:882:817F:C364:4168:A53D:1F38:7C4F (talk) undo Tag: Undo
curprev 02:3902:39, 5 May 2024‎ 2601:882:817f:c364:4168:a53d:1f38:7c4f talk‎ 31,817 bytes −142‎ There was no reference given for the below sentence. "Modern Bible scholars have concluded that the Gospel of Mark was written by an anonymous author rather than an identifiable historical figure." undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

curprev 02:5802:58, 25 April 2024‎ 134.41.56.25 talk‎ 31,959 bytes +18‎ added "Anglican" to the list of churches that commemorate St Mark on April 25. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 04:1104:11, 20 April 2024‎ Tgeorgescu talk contribs‎ 31,941 bytes −32‎ Reverted 1 edit by 75.227.234.25 (talk): Source? undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 00:2000:20, 20 April 2024‎ 75.227.234.25 talk‎ 31,973 bytes +32‎ Added context undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit