Radiocarbon dating: Revision history

20 May 2024

• curprev 02:3502:35, 20 May 2024‎ Headbomb talk contribs‎ 106,192 bytes +16‎ →‎References: |doi-access=free undo

12 May 2024

• curprev 09:5509:55, 12 May 2024‎ 2001:4479:a500:c300:ade0:3905:b8ac:2941 talk‎ 106,176 bytes +1‎ →‎Impact undo

29 April 2024

• curprev 06:1106:11, 29 April 2024‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 106,175 bytes +17‎ Open access bot: hdl updated in citation with #oabot. undo

25 April 2024

• curprev 01:4001:40, 25 April 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 106,158 bytes +25‎ Added hdl. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Srv Ganesh | Category:CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI | #UCB_Category 131/186 undo

19 April 2024

• curprev 15:4915:49, 19 April 2024‎ Mike Christie talk contribs‎ 106,133 bytes +2,047‎ Undid revision 1219745677 by 125.168.120.6 (talk) Taylor and Bar-Yosef discuss the testing of the scrolls undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:4415:44, 19 April 2024‎ 125.168.120.6 talk‎ 104,086 bytes −2,047‎ Neither of the two sources cited in this section related to what is written. All the sources mention is the discovery of radiocarbon dating and how it was used in the 1950s by Libby to prove that relics found in Egypt were tested and shown to be thousands of years old. Nothing in the sources provided mention that the dead sea scrolls have been tested by a credible laboratory to prove how old they are.. Provide sources that present valid and credible evidence to support this. undo Tags: Reverted section blanking Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 14:2214:22, 19 April 2024‎ MrOllie talk contribs‎ 106,133 bytes +1,395‎ Restored revision 1218771227 by Smalljim (talk): Cites are right there undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 14:0814:08, 19 April 2024‎ 125.168.120.6 talk‎ 104,738 bytes −1,395‎ A sample of the linen wrapping from one of these scrolls, the Great Isaiah Scroll, was included in a 1955 analysis by...Whose Libby? What analysis? Where was this analysis/ these analysis' done and by who ? What exactly did they analyse and how did they do it? How was it done? Please provide clearer information because the sources that have been linked are not assessable and without clearer information this part is very confusing and needs more context? undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 April 2024

• curprev 19:0919:09, 13 April 2024‎ Smalljim talk contribs‎ m 106,133 bytes +490‎ Reverted edit by 68.99.133.193 (talk) to last version by Smalljim undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 19:0919:09, 13 April 2024‎ 68.99.133.193 talk‎ 105,643 bytes −490‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 19:0819:08, 13 April 2024‎ Smalljim talk contribs‎ m 106,133 bytes −37‎ Reverted edit by 68.99.133.193 (talk) to last version by InternetArchiveBot undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 19:0719:07, 13 April 2024‎ 68.99.133.193 talk‎ 106,170 bytes +37‎ No edit summary Tags: Reverted possible vandalism featured article or good article template added or removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit