User contributions for ChessFiends
A user with 523 edits. Account created on 4 March 2013.
16 April 2024
- 11:4511:45, 16 April 2024 diff hist −73 Go woke, go broke Undid revision 1219159530 by Nice Stories (talk) undoing good faith edits, the critical sucess of the movies is not important to the topic, and the use of grammar was wrong.
- 02:2602:26, 16 April 2024 diff hist −3,797 The North Face undoing good faith edits by Breadman10, paragraphs largely read as advertisement for the company. Tag: Manual revert
13 April 2024
- 22:4022:40, 13 April 2024 diff hist −87 Mortimer Wheeler several reasons not to include this: 1. we say he was "often criticized" for these things but in his time it appears he was not? perhaps he should have been but... 2: there isn't anything in the body of the article about harassment (accounts of dating his colleagues =/ harassment), 3. the accounts of his groping are unsubstantiated so we should at very least say "alleged", this presents it as if it's a fact: "criticized for bullying and sexually harassing..."
- 14:2914:29, 13 April 2024 diff hist −108 m The Nameless One →References: removing deleted cats Tag: Reverted
- 14:2614:26, 13 April 2024 diff hist +1 The Nameless One No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 14:1614:16, 13 April 2024 diff hist +23,017 The Nameless One Undid revision 1195681703 by Kung Fu Man (talk) article was deleted without a proposal to delete or merge content Tags: Removed redirect Undo Reverted
12 April 2024
- 22:1322:13, 12 April 2024 diff hist +529 Douglas Murray (author) Undid revision 1218631945 by Hemiauchenia (talk) Including both the voices of his critics and his defenders is the very foundation of WP:DUE. What is undue weight is including a large list of criticisms and accusations in his lede in a way that presents it as if it's a consensus.. Tag: Undo
- 19:4319:43, 12 April 2024 diff hist +757 Middle East Eye No edit summary
- 18:2118:21, 12 April 2024 diff hist +543 Douglas Murray (author) this is not a general consensus, but primarily a criticism levied against him by his political adversaries. If we say "is associated with" we need to say by who. And since this is not a clear consensus, we need to make clear that this is a disputed topic.
- 15:5215:52, 12 April 2024 diff hist −64 Ghassan Hage removing unreferenced speculation about cause of his deafness
- 15:4815:48, 12 April 2024 diff hist −468 Ghassan Hage →Contributions: vast number of problems in this section, use of Wikipedia's voice to make the claims of the subject (ie. "highlights the importance of including the permanent processes...", "that became prominent", "an invitation to see racial/colonial", "highlights the critical anthropological task..."), also claims to a work being influential or being his "most important contribution to anthropology" would need to be referenced specifically.
- 15:2715:27, 12 April 2024 diff hist −361 Abdelmalek Sayad removing duplicated translations from bibliography and organizing by date, removing some more imperious claims to greatness from the lede (ie: "central to", "expert of the North-African community"), add back if there is a ref to support it.
- 15:1115:11, 12 April 2024 diff hist −514 Abdelmalek Sayad →Sociology: a vast number of problems with this section, "double prism" is a nonsense term, much of it is written in Wikipedia's voice where it should be in the voice of the subject (ie "examined the difficult situation of migrants... forced into silence"), there would need to be a reference for the claim that he "renewed the approach of French sociology". Also claims to "importance" are so common through sociology articles that each ought to require a ref, and the last ref wasn't genuine.
