User contributions for ZASLOFF

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:1113:11, 10 May 2024 diff hist +660‎ m Squalamine ‎ Self-reference was removed

16:5216:52, 2 May 2024 diff hist +322‎ Trodusquemine ‎ Some "editor" keeps removing my scientifically accurate summary and replacing with an inaccurate jumble. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

13:3013:30, 26 April 2024 diff hist +322‎ Trodusquemine ‎No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted
13:2813:28, 26 April 2024 diff hist +672‎ N User:ZASLOFF ‎ ←Created page with 'A scientifically incorrect review of Trodusquemine was posted likely by a single group that had done some work in coronary heart disease. It is filled with inaccuracies and seems to be focused on their primary interest. I (ZASLOFF) had not devoted any time to Wikipedia, but came across the article several weeks ago. Since my lab discovered the molecule and I have the most expertise regarding its properties, discovery, and development history, I contributed...' current

19:2819:28, 19 April 2024 diff hist +647‎ Talk:Trodusquemine ‎ →‎The works of ZASLOFF: Reply Tag: Reply
17:4917:49, 19 April 2024 diff hist +322‎ Trodusquemine ‎ Remarkable to me how someone keeps restoring a poor piece on Trodusquemine. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

13:5113:51, 16 April 2024 diff hist +322‎ Trodusquemine ‎ I have restored my page on Trodusquemine. Since I am the scientist who has discovered and studied this and related compounds for the past 25 years, I have the expertise to write an article describing the compound. To describe my relationship with Trodusquemine as a "conflict of interest" makes no sense. Tags: Manual revert Reverted