User contributions for Guy Macon Alternate Account
A user with 639 edits. Account created on 14 August 2015.
2 June 2024
- 19:1719:17, 2 June 2024 diff hist +158 Talk:Fels-Naptha ...Chirp... current
1 June 2024
- 19:2219:22, 1 June 2024 diff hist +163 Talk:Incident (Scientology) →Remove the 2008 template?: Good call. Thanks! current
31 May 2024
- 16:5116:51, 31 May 2024 diff hist +253 Talk:Incident (Scientology) →Remove the 2008 template?: new section
24 May 2024
- 23:4023:40, 24 May 2024 diff hist +184 N User talk:EIA258B →WP:ALFA: new section current
- 23:3723:37, 24 May 2024 diff hist −1 NATO phonetic alphabet Undid revision 1225482843 by EIA258B (talk) current Tag: Undo
21 May 2024
- 12:5812:58, 21 May 2024 diff hist +1,739 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: The NATO Phonetic Alphabet is an international standard, not a common name.
19 May 2024
- 02:0702:07, 19 May 2024 diff hist +1,399 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. Remove alchemy?
18 May 2024
- 22:0322:03, 18 May 2024 diff hist +33 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: https://i.sstatic.net/WJrzn.jpg
- 21:5721:57, 18 May 2024 diff hist +787 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: the NATO phonetic alphabet is designed to be used by speakers of all languages, including Japanese.
- 21:3621:36, 18 May 2024 diff hist +885 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_01/20180111_nato-alphabet-sign-signal.pdf
- 16:0516:05, 18 May 2024 diff hist +656 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: The NATO phonetic alphabet is prescriptive, not descriptive.
- 15:2315:23, 18 May 2024 diff hist +371 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: All respellings are defective in one way or another
- 15:1615:16, 18 May 2024 diff hist +2,630 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →"We are biased towards chemistry, and biased against alchemy": Blorgk? Blorgk! Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
- 01:0101:01, 18 May 2024 diff hist +752 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →"We are biased towards chemistry, and biased against alchemy": What are we biased agaist?
- 00:4200:42, 18 May 2024 diff hist +662 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: Again I say, we should delete the repellings from ICAO and replace them with these respellings from NATO: [ https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_01/20180111_nato-alphabet-sign-signal.pdf ]
- 00:2300:23, 18 May 2024 diff hist +666 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: I prefer quotation marks over 'italics
17 May 2024
- 05:1605:16, 17 May 2024 diff hist +761 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Mystery formatting: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_01/20180111_nato-alphabet-sign-signal.pdf
- 04:0004:00, 17 May 2024 diff hist +360 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar →Comments by other users: I suspect that he may be creating accounts, vandalising with them, then quickly reverting the vandalism using an IP. Tag: Reverted
- 03:5403:54, 17 May 2024 diff hist +8 m User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →"We are biased towards chemistry, and biased against alchemy": Minor corrections
- 03:5103:51, 17 May 2024 diff hist +467 User talk:Apaugasma/No. We are not biased. →Apparently?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Guy_Macon/Yes._We_are_biased.#%22We_are_biased_towards_chemistry%2C_and_biased_against_alchemy%22 current
- 03:4703:47, 17 May 2024 diff hist +2,493 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →"We are biased towards chemistry, and biased against alchemy": new section
16 May 2024
- 16:1716:17, 16 May 2024 diff hist +1,619 User talk:Apaugasma/No. We are not biased. →Apparently?: I was glad to see it the link restored by another editor. I want the link there because I really like the idea of opposing essays.
15 May 2024
- 21:5321:53, 15 May 2024 diff hist +544 User talk:Apaugasma/No. We are not biased. →Apparently?: new section
- 19:4219:42, 15 May 2024 diff hist +366 Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet →Generation Alpha etc.: The usage is also clearly from the Greek alphabet (Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon Zeta Eta Theta) and not the NATO phonetic alphabet (Alfa Bravo Charlie Delta Echo Foxtrot Golf Hotel)
- 19:2119:21, 15 May 2024 diff hist +218 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →You were quoted by Creation.com (Creation Ministries International)!: Always nice to have fame and fortune.
14 May 2024
- 18:1818:18, 14 May 2024 diff hist +1,646 User talk:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. →You were quoted by Creation.com (Creation Ministries International)!: Annual Layers (Varves) in Lake Sediments Show the Earth Is Not Young
12 May 2024
- 02:0802:08, 12 May 2024 diff hist +263 Talk:Angzarr →Use on XKCD: new section
9 May 2024
- 23:1023:10, 9 May 2024 diff hist +272 User talk:BilledMammal/2023 Wikimedia RfC →Wikimedia Endowment: Arbitrary section break: That link is dead.
- 22:1622:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist +635 User talk:BilledMammal/2023 Wikimedia RfC →Opened discussion at VPI: Now at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)/Archive_51#Enwiki-WMF_Relationship_discussions.
20 April 2024
- 01:1701:17, 20 April 2024 diff hist +834 Talk:Benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome →As prescribed?: new section current
- 01:0301:03, 20 April 2024 diff hist +570 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Sexist comment by Chris Troutman: For the record...
19 April 2024
- 16:4116:41, 19 April 2024 diff hist +506 Talk:Dianetics →Time to remove the template?: Maintenance templates are not meant to be in articles permanently.
- 16:2316:23, 19 April 2024 diff hist +708 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard →Are religious matters outside the scope of the Fringe Theory Board: Horses, elephants, and steel swords in the New World at the time of Christ
- 16:1016:10, 19 April 2024 diff hist +17 Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard {{reflist-talk}}
17 April 2024
- 00:0000:00, 17 April 2024 diff hist +284 Category talk:Video games developed in North Korea →Linus Tech Tips: new section current
13 April 2024
- 20:4120:41, 13 April 2024 diff hist +643 Talk:Naftalan oil →"naphthenic hydrocarbons": We can safely say that it is unlikely that anyone is purposely drinking the crude oil or putting it in their eyes, but we can also safely say that they are inhaling the fumes. current
